Photo by Rebecca Weiss A couple of years ago, there was a debate in the literary world about “likeable” characters. The question, essentially, boiled down to this: must a character be unpleasant, whether angry or aggressive, selfish, or all gloom-and-doom in order to be taken seriously as a literary character? When the debate arose, the focus was primarily on female characters— if a female protagonist has too many redeemable qualities as a person, does this detract from her substance as a character in a story? This query nagged at me and took on a new shape during my writing Trouble the Water , as I watched my two main protagonists undergo journeys of personal growth that left them both decidedly more pleasant than the people they were when the story began. The question I needed to answer was whether depth and meaning are negated by personal recoveries? My own take, as a reader, is that if I am going to spend hours reading a novel, hanging out with cha...
I got stuck at 4AM, I thought I would faint. But I didn't and I am so proud!! So happy you've enjoyed the readathon! And I loved Catching Fire <3 <3 And Mockingjay too <3 I really loved this event! I had an incredible time :)
ReplyDelete4-5am were the hardest for me..I finally just crashed at 5am, right at the 23 hour mark. Zzzzz
ReplyDeleteI loved this event and I can't wait to do it again!
The Relentless Reader
I totally agree. :)
Delete